Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: hdw at kallisti.se (Anders B Jansson)
- Subject: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 19:13:56 +0200
Giorgio Fedon wrote: > Worse is to sustain the fact that the world need a better bluetooth > sniffer, using the information that can be found inside the warezed > version of the tool. The opensource community I think that is able to do > it's own research without software piracy. If the information is within the 'warezed' version, then it's also within 'the non-warezed' one. Using available distributed information to write software isn't piracy. Taking someones written software and distributing it as your own and under your own terms most certainly is. But building on someones idea and distributed information to write a different tool (smaller, bigger, better, worse, cheaper, what ever) isn't. -- // hdw
- Follow-Ups:
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: jf
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Kevin Finisterre (lists)
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Next by thread: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Index(es):