Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: giorgio.fedon at gmail.com (Giorgio Fedon)
- Subject: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:37:48 +0200
Hi Kevin, I could understand that vendors are charging simple CSR dongles (19 dollars??) up to thousands of dollars. But the way to publish a paper making a direct reference (if someone is aware about the underlying piece of software he is talking about) to a particular vendor it's not so cute. Maybe they have written their firmware. Worse is to sustain the fact that the world need a better bluetooth sniffer, using the information that can be found inside the warezed version of the tool. The opensource community I think that is able to do it's own research without software piracy. 2007/4/1, Kevin Finisterre (lists) <kf_lists at digitalmunition.com>: > > Giorgio if anything he is blowing the whistle on the vendors that > charge a metric shit ton for a piece of hardware that is not necessary. > -KF > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20070401/9d09756d/attachment.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Anders B Jansson
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: jf
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Kevin Finisterre (lists)
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] Windows .ANI LoadAniIcon Stack Overflow
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Next by thread: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Index(es):