Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: jf at danglingpointers.net (jf)
- Subject: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 22:04:28 +0000 (UTC)
Hi, You missed the point completely. He's not promoting software piracy but showing that the high-dollar bluetooth sniifers are not required and that you're average dongle can do everything that a proprietary product can. Also, if your going to make thinly veiled adverts for a group, you should probably ensure that they are findable via google or similar. On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Giorgio Fedon wrote: > Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:52:59 +0200 > From: Giorgio Fedon <giorgio.fedon at gmail.com> > To: full-disclosure at lists.grok.org.uk > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth > > Hi Max, you are promoting Software Piracy. > Like a group of warez people so called - "Team IND" > > 2007/3/30, Max Moser <max.moser at gmail.com>: > > > > Dear List > > > > During the last year, rumours had come to my attention that apparently > > it is possible to transform a standard 30USD Bluetooth(r) dongle into > > a full-blown Bluetooth(r) sniffer. Thinking you absolutely need > > Hardware to be able to hop 79 channels 1600 times a second I was > > rather suspicious about these claims. > >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: Giorgio Fedon
- [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] Windows .ANI LoadAniIcon Stack Overflow
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Windows .ANI LoadAniIcon Stack Overflow
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Next by thread: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- Index(es):