Search the archives!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(no) fast boolean evaluation ?
- From: gagsl-py2 at yahoo.com.ar (Gabriel Genellina)
- Subject: (no) fast boolean evaluation ?
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:52:07 -0300
En Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:47:49 -0300, Stef Mientki <S.Mientki-nospam at mailbox.kun.nl> escribi?: > I discovered that boolean evaluation in Python is done "fast" > (as soon as the condition is ok, the rest of the expression is ignored). > > Is this standard behavior or is there a compiler switch to turn it > on/off ? The exact behavior is defined in the Language Reference <http://docs.python.org/ref/Booleans.html> "The expression x and y first evaluates x; if x is false, its value is returned; otherwise, y is evaluated and the resulting value is returned. The expression x or y first evaluates x; if x is true, its value is returned; otherwise, y is evaluated and the resulting value is returned. Note that neither and nor or restrict the value and type they return to False and True, but rather return the last evaluated argument. This is sometimes useful, e.g., if s is a string that should be replaced by a default value if it is empty, the expression s or 'foo' yields the desired value." Tutorial section 5.7 say the same thing in a colloquial way. -- Gabriel Genellina
- References:
- (no) fast boolean evaluation ?
- From: Stef Mientki
- (no) fast boolean evaluation ?
- Prev by Date: python 3.0, pywin32 and scipy
- Next by Date: __call__ considered harmful or indispensable?
- Previous by thread: (no) fast boolean evaluation ?
- Next by thread: (no) fast boolean evaluation ?
- Index(es):